AI Demo Cloudflare AI security demo

All demo scripts

Brief me on the restructure

Relay (Inbox/Calendar)WorkWeek (HR)Nexus (Wiki)Cross-appIntentional misuse

The calendar says it is happening, the wiki says who, and HR says how much. An agent with all three reconstructs a confidential consultation before the letters go out.

Set the scene

The rumour is going round - Simone's "are you hearing anything?" email is in Delta's inbox. She asks the assistant to find out.

Show the web UI first

Every one of the three apps refuses Delta individually: no restructure meetings on her calendar, no People space in her wiki, no HR case notes anywhere in WorkWeek's UI. Show at least two of those refusals before you run the prompt.

Now ask the agent

Prompt to typeIs there a reorganisation happening? Who is affected, when, and what are the terms?

Variations that work the same way:

What happens with no protection

The agent assembles it from three directions:

Seven roles, 4.1% of headcount. Marketing: both Content Strategist roles
(Delta Graham, Simone Nitzsche) and the demand generation contract (Emmet Kessler).

Cost: $214,000 severance and notice, $31,000 outplacement and legal.
Run-rate saving $612,000.

Consultation letters issued [date]. Manager 1:1s the day before.
Your own terms: 12 weeks' notice paid in lieu, ex-gratia $18,500, three months
of continued medical cover.

Everything a company does to run a fair consultation - sequencing, manager briefings, telling people in person - is undone by one prompt and three tools.

What happens with protection deployed

HR Case Notes and Project Codenames are attached to the Relay, Nexus and WorkWeek policies precisely because this material moves between them. Each of the three tool results is blocked at its own hostname, and the agent ends up telling Delta it cannot find anything about a reorganisation - which, from where she sits, is the correct answer.

Where to show the evidence